Cedrik-Marcel Stebe vs Tiago Pereira Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• Pereira has a slight edge in second serve performance, securing 48.16% of points over the last 6 months, compared to Stebe's 45.4%.
• Stebe slightly outperforms Pereira in return game stats, winning 46.72% of opponent's second serve points versus Pereira's 45.23%.
• In first serve returns, Stebe again has the advantage with a 29.44% win rate, while Pereira sits at 27.26%.
• Both players exhibit resilience under pressure, with Pereira saving 54.72% of breakpoints, a bit higher than Stebe's 51.49%.
• Overall match performance over the past year shows Stebe with a higher win percentage of 65% compared to Pereira's 60.61%.
• When considering surface preference, Pereira favors Hard courts with a 61% win rate, whereas Stebe excels on Indoor Hard courts with a 62% win rate.
• Stebe has been more successful in Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments, winning 83.33% of matches, compared to Pereira’s 66.67% success rate.
• The average rankings of their opponents in the last year are similar, with Stebe facing slightly tougher competition (average rank 343.7) than Pereira (average rank 366.53).
• In deciding sets, Stebe is unbeaten in the last 12 months, while Pereira has a 53% win rate in such situations.
• Recent form in breakpoint conversions indicates a narrow lead for Stebe, converting 33.71% compared to Pereira’s 32.23%.

Editorial Prediction (August 6, 2025, UTC):

This upcoming tennis encounter presents a fascinating matchup between Pereira and Stebe. Analyzing their recent performance patterns reveals a close contest in various aspects. Pereira holds an edge in second serve success, which often plays a crucial role in tight matches. However, Stebe's superior return game statistics suggest an ability to consistently challenge Pereira's serve.

Under high-pressure situations, Pereira slightly outshines in saving breakpoints, showcasing mental fortitude. Yet, Stebe's remarkable record in deciding sets cannot be overlooked and presents a significant advantage if the match extends to such lengths.

Historically, surface performance also plays a vital role, with Pereira favoring Hard courts, though Stebe's preference and success on Indoor Hard courts may influence his play. Moreover, Stebe's higher win rate in recent, competitive events further underscores his current form.

Overall, while both players feature well in various statistics, Stebe's consistent edge in lifecycle stages and deciding sets, along with his superior performance in Futures and ITF events, positions him as the favorite. Based on these insights, Stebe is more likely to emerge as the winner in this contest.